** PID: Proportional Integral Derivative http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PID_controller
I had originally only used the rather uncommon PD parameters in the DG Generator regulator as it was suggested by someone with a strong experience, it was simpler to implement (there are some odd issues around the I factor), and it produced good results. However, as the Arduino Alternator Regulator was deployed with different combinations of alternators and batteries, excess cycling started to appear. At all times the battery was protected from over voltage due to the 'load dump' safety checks, but those same load-dump checks also tended to exasperate the cycle.
I have expanded the controller engine in V0.1.4 of the source code to implement all three parameters (PID) for voltage, amperage, and wattage regulation. Which brings up a whole new class of work: Tuning...
Tuning the PID engine is going to take some time, and I hope input from others. It may be that a common set of tuning parameters cannot be found to cover all variations of alternators / batteries - and some reduced set be selected based on DIP switching settings. OR it may be that some type of run-time self adjustment factor is needed. This is all TBD. For now, the v0.1.4 release has the original tuning values in it, and I have entered a 0 for the 'I' factors - disabling that component in the default. In this way, this release will function as prior releases have. If there is anyone out there with insight into PID engines, perhaps they can share?
There are several other small changes / corrections as well. Including:
- Improved summing logic in manage_alt(). Prior summing logic for the different regulator factors (volts, amps, watts, etc..) would allow too large of an increase in the PWM when one of the factors only wanted a small change. Example, if Volts decided a +1 was needed, the rest of the regulated values would often push that up to a +2. New code makes sure the smallest change is brought forward.
- Sudo-dynamic rate-of-PWM-chage-cap. There is a hard cap of +2 PWM changes at any given 100mS sampling period (slowing during the ramp up period). The new summing logic above effectively reduced that max ROC value as one of the regulated values gets close to its target. With this, in future releases I may be able to increase somewhat the max ROC value from +2 to say +4 or +5 - but want to make that change in combinations with any PID tuning results.
- int2frac() at would cause 13,998v to be presented as 13.00 as opposed to 13.99 or 14.00v Corrected (now will just show 13.99v - no rounding factor)
- DBG; string has been adjusted - see source code for what it now shows in detail.
- #TESTING mode 'battery' model enhanced - to allow more realistic simulation modes. See read_INA226() function.
- Added fixed correction offset for hardware design issue with Amp shunt level shifter - which caused a display of 14-17A when the shunt was not connected.
The source of the noise is the LDO 3.3v regulator U1 as it manages voltage around 3.3v - and reports back from folks using the Arduino Alternator Regulator match my measurements and seem consistent. And as there are already several examples of this regulator out there, implementing a hardware fix might be problematic. As such, v0.1.4 of the source code has a correcting factor of 522 added to the raw Amp Shunt reading to adjust for this asymmetrical division of common mode noise via R22 / R24. See 'VERY BAD!' read_INA226()
Finally. I was able to at last install this source code into a live alternator aboard Viking Star - so it has had at least one test run! Over the coming weeks I will be doing more and more test runs, likely refining the software and making changes to the tuning engine.
And a last note: The code is growing. With the above additions I ended up being over-sized in TESTING + DEBUG mode. So, I disabled ASCII INPUTS via a check in loop() while in TESTING mode. I may try to look for code reduction opportunities in the future, but for now take note of this change. As the tuning firms up some, if it turns out the new 'I' factor is not needed - will pull it from the code to recover some of that code space.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.